Nottingham: not all bad
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/602ea/602eae099f0b7f924b5fd4c85dea71c697b58a99" alt=""
While reading through the copious verbiage already afforded to the story, I was disturbed to discover that somebody has already written an article using the incident to justify arming the police. Intriguingly, the piece is entitled,"Pc shooting sparks police arms call," but provides little evidence to support this claim. The author avers, "The shooting of Rachael Bown, a probationary officer, is sure to reopen the debate over whether British officers should routinely be armed." This is as maybe, but it's one thing to suggest that such a debate is likely and quite another to claim that it is actually taking place as the headline implies. Later the report claims that anonymous "campaigners said that police need to be armed to properly defend themselves and the public." (Unless of course "the public" have "Mongolian eyes".)
An increasingly militarised state won't make us any safer and doesn't even begin to address the underlying causes of gun crime in Nottingham. Generally speaking, gun crime in Nottingham is fuelled by drugs (apparently its on the route down from Manchester to London) and drugs crime feeds off poverty. The law and order mob don't like to face up to this because of the inevitable effect it will have on their own social status. On another front, community efforts like Nottingham Stands Together, organised following the murder of Danielle Beccan perhaps point to a less state-centric response to the problem of gun-crime in the city.
File Under: Crime, News, Nottingham, Police, UK
<< Home